What do you think of the STATEMENT of a BELGIAN INTERIOR MINISTRY OFFICIAL and WHY?

December 21, 2011 - 8:54 pm 6 Comments

A group of men with hand granades and guns kill civilians and he says the following…

A Belgian Interior Ministry official, Peter Mertens, says there was only one attacker, who was killed in the incident, adding that it was not related to terrorism.

What does he mean ? Is this even more proof that the West is having a war against Islaam and not really with terrorism, how is the above incident NOT terrorism ?

It is indeed a terrorist attack, how is it not? I guess and afraid that Belgian people have a minister who don’t have a proper working brain!!!!

and moreover whoever saying here where is the word "Islam"? then what westren countries have in their minds? by saying it is not a terror attack it means people not get terrorised when some one throw hand grandes kill humans infront of them!!!!

so it means if some one who is a christian/jew/… if he kills some one it is not terror attack atleast in Belgium!!!!

6 Responses to “What do you think of the STATEMENT of a BELGIAN INTERIOR MINISTRY OFFICIAL and WHY?”

  1. BT 498 Says:

    Hi Noub,
    How is this proof that the West is having a war against Islam? He said it *wasn’t* terror related. I don’t see the word "Islam" anywhere in his statement.

    The attack was definitely a terrorist attack. However, all of the news reports I have read have stated nothing at all about Islam.

    Maybe I’m not understanding what you are trying to say.
    References :

  2. Friday Moon Says:

    might is right

    the mighty formulate our language and our defintions

    but the meek will inherit the heavens

    their respite is temporary, like Satans

    eventually

    Inna lillahe wa inna illahe raijioon

    How blessed we are to have Emaan :)
    References :

  3. Scythian Says:

    If the west is in a war with Islam why are you Muslims flooding the west en masse and living on western welfare benefits. Shouldn’t you all be blowing yourselves up en masse since jihad is mandatory in such a case.
    References :

  4. لا إله إلا الله‎ lyfisatest Says:

    My Brothers In Belgium atm :/
    And yeah It was an act of terrorism Obviously They Just dont wanna admit it
    References :

  5. rubusmubu Says:

    It is indeed a terrorist attack, how is it not? I guess and afraid that Belgian people have a minister who don’t have a proper working brain!!!!

    and moreover whoever saying here where is the word "Islam"? then what westren countries have in their minds? by saying it is not a terror attack it means people not get terrorised when some one throw hand grandes kill humans infront of them!!!!

    so it means if some one who is a christian/jew/… if he kills some one it is not terror attack atleast in Belgium!!!!
    References :

  6. Micheal Cullis Says:

    They can lie all they like but terrorism is of many types.

    It’s to keep the public from questioning the politicians and security agencies (who are the only ones getting rich from terrorism) that they bring the term out only when they want to scare the public. They can then take more taxpayer money for free or put n more anti-democratic laws without a mandate and public consultation.
    References :

Leave a Reply